<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moon Through Our Telescope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glenncrocker.com/2009/03/the-moon-through-our-telescope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glenncrocker.com/2009/03/the-moon-through-our-telescope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:28:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Crocker</title>
		<link>http://www.glenncrocker.com/2009/03/the-moon-through-our-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Crocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenncrocker.com/?p=44#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that camera of yours IS a decent telescope!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that camera of yours IS a decent telescope!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.glenncrocker.com/2009/03/the-moon-through-our-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenncrocker.com/?p=44#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Oops.  Next full moon is April 8, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  Next full moon is April 8, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.glenncrocker.com/2009/03/the-moon-through-our-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenncrocker.com/?p=44#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Yes, I love my new camera.  It will not let me take a bad picture.  Well, that may be an exaggeration but it takes remarkably crisp pictures.  The long zoom, tilting viewfinder, and motion stabilizer do wonders to extend my range and mobility.  I can sit in the car and take closeups of things at a pretty good distance.  For example: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_kWnD1qfyTls/SbhEIU7mTsI/AAAAAAAAB1s/86WjDt0jEwA/s1600-h/HyacinthWhite.jpg

Since I saw your moon picture I have wanted to try mine out (Canon Powershot SX10IS) but it has been overcast.  I think I will put it on a tripod and see just how well it does on a clear night.  Next full moon is April 20 rising early enough so I will still be awake.  I think I will put it on a tripod and see just how well it does on a clear night.  With 20x zoom and 10 megapix on a tripod it should be pretty clear.  I never had a decent telescope so this might be the next best thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I love my new camera.  It will not let me take a bad picture.  Well, that may be an exaggeration but it takes remarkably crisp pictures.  The long zoom, tilting viewfinder, and motion stabilizer do wonders to extend my range and mobility.  I can sit in the car and take closeups of things at a pretty good distance.  For example: <a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_kWnD1qfyTls/SbhEIU7mTsI/AAAAAAAAB1s/86WjDt0jEwA/s1600-h/HyacinthWhite.jpg" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/2.bp.blogspot.com');" rel="nofollow">http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_kWnD1qfyTls/SbhEIU7mTsI/AAAAAAAAB1s/86WjDt0jEwA/s1600-h/HyacinthWhite.jpg</a></p>
<p>Since I saw your moon picture I have wanted to try mine out (Canon Powershot SX10IS) but it has been overcast.  I think I will put it on a tripod and see just how well it does on a clear night.  Next full moon is April 20 rising early enough so I will still be awake.  I think I will put it on a tripod and see just how well it does on a clear night.  With 20x zoom and 10 megapix on a tripod it should be pretty clear.  I never had a decent telescope so this might be the next best thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Crocker</title>
		<link>http://www.glenncrocker.com/2009/03/the-moon-through-our-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Crocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenncrocker.com/?p=44#comment-122</guid>
		<description>This particular shot was hand-held, pointing the camera (with a lens on the camera) down into the eyepiece of the telescope.  Had to take a few shots to get a decent one, but for such a simple setup, it was effective!

I have a mount that attaches the camera to the scope as well, but have had trouble aligning it correctly.  Not sure why.

The telescope has a 130mm reflector, focal length of 650mm, f/5, I think. Magnification would have been 26x or so, I think.  The photographic resolution quoted is 400 lines/mm.  It&#039;s one of these:  &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000FAQZFE?tag=nm-paraplast-20&amp;camp=0&amp;creative=0&amp;linkCode=as4&amp;creativeASIN=B000FAQZFE&amp;adid=1H27PP0BJRPG3TX2K2N4&amp;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Celestron NexStar 130&lt;/a&gt;

Camera was a Rebel XT, kit lens I think.  Your new camera should do a very good job on its own.  Still like it?  A friend was asking about cameras today and I mentioned the one you just got.

-glenn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular shot was hand-held, pointing the camera (with a lens on the camera) down into the eyepiece of the telescope.  Had to take a few shots to get a decent one, but for such a simple setup, it was effective!</p>
<p>I have a mount that attaches the camera to the scope as well, but have had trouble aligning it correctly.  Not sure why.</p>
<p>The telescope has a 130mm reflector, focal length of 650mm, f/5, I think. Magnification would have been 26x or so, I think.  The photographic resolution quoted is 400 lines/mm.  It&#8217;s one of these:  <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000FAQZFE?tag=nm-paraplast-20&#038;camp=0&#038;creative=0&#038;linkCode=as4&#038;creativeASIN=B000FAQZFE&#038;adid=1H27PP0BJRPG3TX2K2N4&#038;" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.amazon.com');" rel="nofollow">Celestron NexStar 130</a></p>
<p>Camera was a Rebel XT, kit lens I think.  Your new camera should do a very good job on its own.  Still like it?  A friend was asking about cameras today and I mentioned the one you just got.</p>
<p>-glenn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.glenncrocker.com/2009/03/the-moon-through-our-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenncrocker.com/?p=44#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Nice photo.  Have you screwed the camera mount to the eyepiece or is this looking through the lens into the scope?  I need to check out my Canon on the moon.  560mm optical equivalent and 10mpxls should look pretty good.  What is the resolution of your telescope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice photo.  Have you screwed the camera mount to the eyepiece or is this looking through the lens into the scope?  I need to check out my Canon on the moon.  560mm optical equivalent and 10mpxls should look pretty good.  What is the resolution of your telescope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
